2010 Local District Property Value (DPV)
District 1 $ 145,968,635
District 2 $2,916,187,709
I & S (Interest & Sinking Fund) Tax Collection
District 1 $94,871 District 1 $8,836,256
Chapter 46 (EDA) Totals
District 1 $572,716
District 2 $0
Funds Available to Make Payments
District 1 $667,587
District 2 $8,836,256
By examining the figures above, it is apparent that District 2 is a much wealthier district than District 1. District 1only has a local district property value approximately 145 million dollars and District 2 has a local district property value of approximately 2 billion dollars. I would ascertain that the buildings and the infrastructure in District 2 are probably newer and better maintained than those of District 1. With property values as low as they low as they are in District 1 would probably indicate that the buildings in District 1 are somewhat dilapidated and the infrastructure antiquated. I would also envision District 2 to have more intervention and remedial programs than District 1 although they are needed much more in District 1. Even if District 1 had newer buildings, it doesn’t have enough funds available to make payments on them according to calculations above. Since District 2 has the funds available to implement new programs for its struggling students, it is probably rated by the state as a Recognized or Exemplary district. District 1, on the other hand, appears to be experiencing financial hard times and is probably rated by the state as an Acceptable or Unacceptable district.
No comments:
Post a Comment